-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I agree with Melinda.
I would very much like to be able to let the desk clerk at the hotel
know that I won't be paying for their "Internet" service, because it
wasn't RFCxxxx compliant. (I now wish that someone did get the trademark
on that word, and would deny it to locations that offer only NATwork service)
That's the only value I see in this situation.
For the the vendors that have a clue, and will likely be involved in
this process, they are likely already compliant. For those that aren't
compliant, they won't be there. That's tough for them.
- --
] "Elmo went to the wrong fundraiser" - The Simpson | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Xelerance Corporation, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr(_at_)xelerance(_dot_)com http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/mcr/
|device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys
iQCVAwUBQU99x4qHRg3pndX9AQEcZwQA4i29k5yetBQw4We1w6MUPxxrHWqZyfey
QQ3Dz8KA5ESIjIyxV1q8BEXCGjHWQDFdyu4aN/aztwaoYNIiEnf6WCCx6/tNkQr8
OlxCTdE/0gZtEgQ1vkY06JM8Tjy4HtVhwx+hJp8RspuATmV+3j605h4Y5oriZNgk
Xz3QlHLbCMk=
=2cJx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf