On 24 sep 2004, at 11.20, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
So please - take a look, and tell us that you're listening.
I think the poll was a good idea, I hope lots of people take it. I
know I had been reading and generally agreeing with some of the folks
and the poll is a good forcing function for response.
Since my comments are slightly longer then short:
I agree with those who are arguing for Scenario 0 and agree with most
of the arguments, about complexity and timing. I also believe that a
version of C remains a possibility in the future should scenario 0 not
work. Though I think it could.
I also agree with those who argue that we need an accurate job
description for the IAD, and need it soon. I think the startup process
seems reasonable. the timing is challenging, but I believe it could be
done with lots of hard work and lots of good will.
I also agree that 2 IAOC members should be selected by Nomcom - I have
argued before why I consider then qualified to chose. I would have
argued for more, since I believe that 1/2 of the IAOC should be nomcom
selected. However, since I agree with those who argue that the IETF
chair and the IAB chair should be voting members of the IAOC, that
would mean that 4 of the participants were chosen by a Nomcom process,
and that seems a good enough balance.
Ietf mailing list