Hi John,
Thanks for you analysis. It was something I felt lacking and has
helping me in my wavering between the absorption into ISOC model and
the independent corporate model.
I look forward to your analysis of the absorption model.
a.
On 8 sep 2004, at 01.28, John C Klensin wrote:
But,
from a risk analysis standpoint, even the abbreviated list above
is a pretty long list. If any one of those assumptions (or any
of several of those not listed) is not met and things go
seriously wrong, the odds of the standards process grinding to a
complete halt -- think "no meetings", "no IESG phone calls",
and/or "even less functional mailing lists and archives" as
examples-- are non-trivial.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf