On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
scenarios C and D envision incorporating the *support function* for the
IETF. The IETF would remain an undefined entity under these scenarios.
I've had another suggestion that the IETF (the real technical process
entity) should become a formally recognizable entity of some sort (possibly
an unincorporated organization).
The IETF is already describted as an activity of the ISOC, which is
incorprated.
I think the IETF also has paid employees. Aren't these people paid by the
ISOC? If not, please correct this information.
But that's distinct from the idea of incorporating the support function,
and is NOT described in the current document.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf