--On torsdag, september 02, 2004 13:41:52 -0400 Dean Anderson
<dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
scenarios C and D envision incorporating the *support function* for the
IETF. The IETF would remain an undefined entity under these scenarios.
I've had another suggestion that the IETF (the real technical process
entity) should become a formally recognizable entity of some sort
(possibly an unincorporated organization).
The IETF is already describted as an activity of the ISOC, which is
incorprated.
I think the IETF also has paid employees. Aren't these people paid by the
ISOC? If not, please correct this information.
The IETF does not have paid employees.
ISOC has paid employees, but they do not work for the IETF.
Foretec has paid employees doing the secretariat job. ISI has paid
employees doing the RFC Editor job. ICANN has paid employees doing the IANA
job.
The IETF has none.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf