Actually, as far as I can tell the accountability is about the same in both
cases, and in neither case as "direct" as one would philosophically like
(but probably as direct as one can get in practice.) Similarly, the
"change control" appears to be equally in the IETF hands.
Yours,
Joel
At 10:31 PM 9/23/2004 +0200, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
- if done properly, this allows for a very straight forward
governance mechanism that is *directly* accountable to
the IETF and where change control is clearly vested in that
same community. Again, the corporate solution is the
lightweight and straightforward solution.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf