On 7 sep 2004, at 02.13, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
avri(_at_)psg(_dot_)com wrote:
I'm very puzzled. I though those two extremes were exactly described
by scenarios A and D.
Perhaps I misread, but while I saw that A and D are the extremes of the
scenarios represented to date, I was suggesting is that the extremes
not yet discussed are:
- full integration into ISOC with the rework of the by-law that
accommodates the standard's function. Scenario A tends toward this but
does, seem to me, to go all the way.
- Creation of a parallel non profit incorporated Standards organization
with its own by-laws that is partnered though MOU's with ISOC.
Scenario D might evoke this, but since the explanation of this Scenario
is so brief, I have trouble understanding its implications.
In both I have trouble understanding the full implications in terms of
items not within the administrative domain.
If A really does equal full integration and D really does equal full
independence, then I will stand corrected, though I will remain
confused about some of the implications.
a.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf