Carsten,
I think that being deprived of the possibility to debate in the high bandwidth
forum provided the FTF some issues that would better address these issues
qualifies as being disfranchised...
I am willing to improve my English, but based on the definition posted by
Adrian, I think that it fits.
I hope I clarifies.
Stephane
_____
Stephane H. Maes, PhD,
Director of Architecture - Mobile, Oracle Corporation.
Ph: +1-203-300-7786 (mobile/SMS); Fax / UM: +1-650-607-6296.
e-mail: stephane(_dot_)maes(_at_)oracle(_dot_)com
IM: shmaes (AIM, Y!) or stephane_maes(_at_)hotmail(_dot_)com (MSN Messenger)
-----Original Message-----
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo(_at_)tzi(_dot_)org>
To: Stephane Maes <stephane(_dot_)maes(_at_)oracle(_dot_)com>
CC: Carsten Bormann <cabo(_at_)tzi(_dot_)org>; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
<ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Sat Nov 06 21:33:31 2004
Subject: Re: [Inquiry #19085] Issue with Meeting Schedule change at the last
moment
On Nov 06 2004, at 21:27 Uhr, Stephane H. Maes wrote:
disfranchised
If you really have to continue your crusade on the IETF list, can you
at least stop using this word (assuming you mean disenfranchised)?
There is no voting in the IETF, so you can't be deprived of any voting
right.
Gruesse, Carsten
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf