Indeed.
People polled after the election said they put Moral Values as the #1
priorty. I see no reason why the previous and next administration won't
make a morality section a requirement in all published docs.
The immorality of NATs for example...
Is it April already?
What did I miss?
Ole
Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher, The Internet Protocol Journal
Academic Research and Technology Initiatives, Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972 GSM: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, James M. Polk wrote:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-farrel-rtg-morality-requirements-00.txt
I do not see why this ID should be limited to the Routing area...
The Application of General Internet specifications should consider the
Operations and Management of the Security surrounding Transport of morality
considerations, even if in a Sub-IP moral zone.
nuff said?
cheers,
James
*******************
Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf