At 06:44 PM 11/16/2004 -0500, Mike S wrote:
At 05:23 PM 11/16/2004, James M. Polk wrote...
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-farrel-rtg-morality-requirement
s-00.txt
>
>I do not see why this ID should be limited to the Routing area...
Morals exist at layer 3, and are therefore related to Routing.
Ethics exist at layer 2, perhaps you would like to submit an RFC covering
switching ethics?
I'm sure I can drum one up
(Self-preservation and enlightened self-interest are layer 1, and are
self-defining)
seems like these conflict with the known layers 8 (politics) and 9
(religion) - so I believe we'll need an agreeable scope for layer 1 after
all...
cheers,
James
*******************
Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf