Jefsey,
why don't you go yell at the IPv6 Forum - <http://www.ipv6forum.org/>?
It seems far more likely that you will get the IPv6 forum to be effective
by contributing than that you will get the IETF to change its ways by
long-winded messages on the IETF list.
Harald
--On 23. november 2004 15:16 +0100 "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin"
<jefsey(_at_)jefsey(_dot_)com> wrote:
IPv6 is a good example: the IETF deliverable is OK (again Harald is
right). But the main deliverable for the user is a worldwide, Gov
accepted, numbering plan structure. IPv6 is built to be quite transparent
to numbering plan structure. So the ITU-T is the blocking factor. Should
that have been discussed and identified by the NUTF:: instead of
"get[ing] the hell out of the way", ITU-I or ICANN (as now IANA is an
ICANN function disputed by ITU) would have discussed in a joint
conference with ITU-T a long ago and permitted the IETF to continue
working on a real life universal IPv6.
Or, I will continue :-)
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf