At 04:34 AM 2/12/2004, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
At 3:41 PM +0100 12/1/04, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Yes, I've always assumed there will be an MOU between IETF and ISOC,
both to recognize the BCP when we have it, and to make explicit some
of these boundary conditions.
This is interesting, because I had not assumed that there would be a
separate MOU...
Who do you think would negotiate the MOU on behalf of the IETF? And who
would sign it?
I'm also slightly surprised by this perspective (a distinct MoU). I had
though that the process we were following was that this IASA BCP would be a
document that was formally accepted by both the IETF (through the BCP
publication process) and by ISOC (possibly through a formal resolution of
adoption by the Board of Trustees).
So the specific questions that this raises for me would be: What
specifically would be in an MoU between the IETF and ISOC that is not in
this IASA document? (your comment about making explicit some of the
boundary conditions does not shed much light on what you mean here
unfortunately) Also, what would preclude such items (if there are such)
from inclusion in the IASA document?
(I thought Carl's <section title="Community Consensus and Grant of
Authority"> covered this appropriately, by the way, so I'm curious about
the comment that this is not sufficient)
regards,
Geoff
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf