Lynn St.Amour wrote:
At 2:41 PM +0100 12/13/04, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I've gone various ways on this, but I think that imposing a duty of
regular payment on ISOC is appropriate - so that paying the IETF
late doesn't become a tempting cash-flow management tool. I would
be happy with a phrasing that asks for at least 3 payments per
year.
Brian
Brian,
what can we pay late? We have to pay salaries, RFC Editor, meeting
contracts, outsourcing contracts, insurance, etc. on time. This makes
it sound like a deposit model rather than paying for expenses?
Well, I actually don't know - I am thinking in the abstract about
what might go wrong at some unknown point in the future.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf