The way we've been running the experiment, if there is a portion of the
doc that is still useful then we leave it alone but recommend an update.
In other words no status change until someone takes further action.
Having said that, I will remove RFC 1618 from the list, but it would be
great if you did the update and in the process then obsoleted RFC 1618.
Eliot
Carsten Bormann wrote:
On Dec 16 2004, at 12:46 Uhr, Eliot Lear wrote:
RFC1618 PPP over ISDN
We had a short discussion about this in pppext.
The gist was: The document is pretty bad (partly because things were
murky in 1994, but also because it was written by Martians that had no
space ship to take them to the ISDN planet), but some parts of it do
describe what currently shipping, actively marketed products do (and
should do) in this domain.
Having done some ISDN work in the late 80s/early 90s, I all but
volunteered during this discussion to do a DS version of the thing
(probably by striking 80 % of the text and rewriting the rest).
If this is what it takes to keep an active standards-track specification
about IP over ISDN, I'll do that tiny amount of work.
Or we could leave it where it is.
Gruesse, Carsten
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf