ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, specifications, "stability",   and extensions

2005-01-01 09:25:17
 Date: 2004-12-30 16:02
 From: Tex Texin <tex(_at_)xencraft(_dot_)com>
 To: 
 CC: ietf-languages(_at_)alvestrand(_dot_)no, ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
 
As the number of question marks, exclamation marks, asterisks and other forms
of expressing digital shock and awe increase with each mail, I would like to
suggest a temporary cease and desist policy with respect to responding to JFC
until the chair chimes in, presumably after the holidays.

What "chair"?; there is no WG associated with the ietf-languages
list, nor with the individual-effort draft under discussion.
There is of course an IETF/IESG chair, and he has in the past
(most recently about six months ago) participated in the ietf-
languages discussion of a predecessor of the draft under
discussion, but I see no reason to suggest an end to discussion
of issues arising out of a NEW Last Call for comments on that
draft.  I would agree that some of the rhetoric could be toned
down...

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, specifications, "stability",   and extensions, Bruce Lilly <=