RE: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability",

Small typo: In my previous response I referred to RFC 1766 when I meant
RFC 3066. Too many documents open at once, sorry.

                                Ned

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions, Dave Singer RE: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions, ned . freed RE: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions, ned . freed <= RE: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions, Dave Singer Re: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions, John Cowan Re: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions, John Cowan Re: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions, ned . freed Re: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions, John Cowan Re: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions, ned . freed Re: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions, John Cowan Re: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions, ned . freed Re: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions, John C Klensin Re: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions, John Cowan

RE: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions