No show stoppers.
Personally, I also think the text in 3.5 and 3.6 provides enough
checks and balances to get IASA started, and we should defer the
review/appeal debate until later. I consider it more urgent to have
the BCP approved as a stake in the ground than to make it perfect.
Brian
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
Folks,
the latest draft - draft-ietf-iasa-bcp-05 - was published yesterday.
The editors believe that we now have text known to be acceptable to the
IETF consensus on all issues raised except the issue of appeals, where
we are still searching for a proper understanding and consensus.
I would like to verify this with the community, by asking the question
"is this document OK" somewhat differently from before.
I *know* that there are always things that could be phrased better,
safeguards that can be lowered or raised, concerns that could be
addressed either in this document or in others.
But - in the interest of eventually stabilizing the document, I'll ask
it this way:
Are there issues in the document now, apart from the "appeals" question,
that cause you to believe that this document should not be approved
as-is as "IETF consensus"?In other words: Are there show-stopper issues
in -05?
I will ask the same question (separately) of the ISOC BoT, the IESG and
the IAB.
If no show-stopper issues emerge, and we achieve a consensus on appeals,
I will send out a (brief) request for minor issues you have identified
such as spelling errors, get those incorporated in an -06, and ask for
formal approval of that in all relevant bodies.
If show-stopper issues emerge, and it's clear to the IETF that they are
show-stoppers..... the show stops. Of course.
Harald
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf