On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Sam Hartman wrote:
"Larry" == Larry Masinter <LMM(_at_)acm(_dot_)org> writes:
Larry> Does anyone see any real need to issue a new document on
Larry> the "gopher" URI scheme merely to declare it "Historic"?
Yes. Our process currently requires a document action or protocol
action to move a document to historic. This could be done for each
URL, or a document could be published noting that except for certain
URI schemes, the schemes defined in 1738 are moved to historic.
Well, there is:
http://www.ofcourseimright.com/oldstandards.html
Maybe there is no need for these "is Historic" documents, but rather
this could be addressed by revising (and progressing) the
specification (taking the obsolete stuff out) which introduced them in
the first place?
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf