On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:03:32 -0500, Tony Hansen wrote:
Of course, the rule about -00 drafts could be modified to allow them to
be posted on the followup date IF and ONLY IF they are now a WG draft
AND they've been previously published as an individual submission.
from the line of commentary that John Klensin has been pursuing, it might be
worth looking at Tony's suggestion, in terms of effort and efficacy.
The suggestion is reasonable one, if the community feels that there is
important quality control (or equivalent) issue in strictly regulating name
assignment. Unfortunately, it adds more procedure onto a process that is
already signficant. Enforcing contingent restrictions take careful attention
by Secretariat staff.
Is this really the sort of thing we want to focus on?
It's just a name.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
+1.408.246.8253
dcrocker a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf