And I didn't say "voting"; that was Jeroen.
The free site I found says "voting"; of course, what the IETF
can use such things for is only straw polls. But in a case
like the present one, I think that is a reasonable way of
finding out what the centre of gravity of opinion is.
In ASCII art:
/\
Consensus: ____/ \___
/\
Rough Consensus ____/ \___/\___
Badly phrased question: ___/\____/\____/\____/\___
(I'm reasonably serious about that)
Brian
Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org]On
Behalf Of Jeroen Massar
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 11:52 +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Well, I thought I'd try something daring. We have people
arguing about xml versus nroff (again). If you write Internet
Drafts, try this toy (and only vote once, please...).
If the toy doesn't work, don't blame me... I just found the
site with Google.
http://www.internationalvoting.com/int3/ask.cgi?pid=22-143
As this is the tools discussion after all, might it maybe be
a good tool
to have a voting tool for the IETF?
When the IETF Chair says 'voting' you should take it as a metaphor, I believe.
Dan
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf