IETF Discussion (date)
April 30, 2005
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Joe Touch, 21:55
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Dave Crocker, 21:41
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Fred Baker, 21:04
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Dave Crocker, 11:13
- IETF Throughput (was RE: Voting (again)), Ash, Gerald R \(Jerry\), ALABS, 11:06
- Re: technical supervisors (was: improving WG operation), John C Klensin, 05:44
- Re: technical supervisors (was: improving WG operation), Keith Moore, 04:48
- Where is the IESG?, Brian E Carpenter, 00:24
April 29, 2005
- Re: technical supervisors (was: improving WG operation), Pekka Savola, 23:41
- technical supervisors (was: improving WG operation), Keith Moore, 22:41
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Ralph Droms, 20:06
- Re: improving WG operation (was Re: Voting (again)), John Leslie, 19:28
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore, 16:58
- Re: Time to charter (was: Re: improving WG operation (was Re: Voting (again))), Dave Crocker, 16:48
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Dave Crocker, 15:53
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Frank Ellermann, 15:48
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Joe Touch, 15:40
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Dave Crocker, 15:33
- Re: improving WG operation, Dave Crocker, 15:24
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Bob Braden, 15:15
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Bob Braden, 15:10
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:07
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Dave Crocker, 14:46
- Re: text suggested by ADs, John C Klensin, 14:20
- Time to charter (was: Re: improving WG operation (was Re: Voting (again))), John C Klensin, 13:49
- Re: improving WG operation, John C Klensin, 13:28
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:20
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Bob Braden, 12:49
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:40
- Re: improving WG operation, Keith Moore, 11:50
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 10:59
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Jari Arkko, 09:51
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore, 09:19
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:19
- RE: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Soliman, Hesham, 08:26
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Ralph Droms, 06:36
- Re: improving WG operation (was Re: Voting (again)), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 06:31
- Re: improving WG operation (was Re: Voting (again)), Jari Arkko, 05:51
- Re: improving WG operation (was Re: Voting (again)), Keith Moore, 05:22
- NSIS/NTLP Interoperability Event before IETF in Paris, Martin Stiemerling, 05:08
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Jari Arkko, 03:32
- Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Jari Arkko, 03:19
- Re: improving WG operation (was Re: Voting (again)), Jari Arkko, 02:55
April 28, 2005
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore, 23:02
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore, 22:26
- Re: What's been done [Re: Voting (again)], Dave Crocker, 21:09
- Re: Re: text suggested by ADs, John Loughney, 21:04
- RE: Voting (again), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 20:26
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:43
- Re: What's been done [Re: Voting (again)], Dave Crocker, 18:12
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore, 17:57
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 17:53
- Re: Important protocol development, Dave Crocker, 17:47
- Re: improving WG operation (was Re: Voting (again)), Dave Crocker, 17:40
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 17:39
- Re: Important protocol development, Aaron Falk, 17:37
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore, 17:28
- Re: What's been done [Re: Voting (again)], John C Klensin, 17:11
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Fred Baker, 16:57
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore, 16:49
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:18
- RE: Important protocol development, Elwyn Davies, 15:59
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Ralph Droms, 15:57
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Joe Touch, 15:43
- RE: Important protocol development, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:39
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:36
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore, 15:29
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Ralph Droms, 15:20
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Randy Presuhn, 15:10
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Joe Touch, 14:49
- Re: improving WG operation (was Re: Voting (again)), John C Klensin, 12:59
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore, 12:00
- Re: text suggested by ADs, John C Klensin, 11:47
- text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore, 11:12
- RE: What's been done [Re: Voting (again)], Dave Crocker, 09:27
- Re: Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Dave Crocker, 08:55
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker, 08:54
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch, 08:02
- improving WG operation (was Re: Voting (again)), Keith Moore, 06:17
- Re: Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Spencer Dawkins, 05:35
- Re: what should I do IRT a draft I partly support and oppose, Sam Hartman, 05:09
- RE: What's been done [Re: Voting (again)], Pekka Savola, 00:38
- RE: What's been done [Re: Voting (again)], Lars-Erik Jonsson \(LU/EAB\), 00:30
April 27, 2005
- Re: Re: Voting (again), John Loughney, 23:24
- Re: Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), John Loughney, 23:18
- Re: Re: Voting (again), John Loughney, 23:12
- Re: Voting (again), Pekka Savola, 21:48
- Re: Separated document review [Re: Voting (again)], Pekka Savola, 21:37
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch, 15:28
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore, 15:13
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch, 15:10
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore, 14:58
- Re: Voting (again), Fred Baker, 14:00
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch, 13:57
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore, 13:50
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch, 13:27
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore, 12:58
- Re: Voting (again), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 12:24
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore, 11:50
- what should I do IRT a draft I partly support and oppose, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 11:34
- Re: Separated document review [Re: Voting (again)], Adrian Farrel, 11:28
- Separated document review [Re: Voting (again)], Pekka Savola, 11:18
- Re: Voting (again), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 11:00
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch, 09:41
- Re: Important protocol development, Marshall Eubanks, 09:16
- Re: Important protocol development, Dave Crocker, 09:00
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore, 08:59
- Re: What's been done [Re: Voting (again)], Dave Crocker, 08:41
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch, 07:43
- Important protocol development, Ole Jacobsen, 07:23
- Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Edward Lewis, 06:10
- Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Edward Lewis, 06:00
- Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Spencer Dawkins, 05:43
- Re: Voting (again), Eliot Lear, 05:36
- Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Brian E Carpenter, 05:26
- Re: Voting (again), Brian E Carpenter, 05:08
- Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Jari Arkko, 03:59
- Re: What's been done [Re: Voting (again)], Jari Arkko, 03:54
- What's been done [Re: Voting (again)], Brian E Carpenter, 00:18
April 26, 2005
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore, 22:25
- Re: Spreading/reducing the load (was: Re: Voting (again)), Keith Moore, 21:23
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker, 20:37
- Spreading/reducing the load (was: Re: Voting (again)), John C Klensin, 20:35
- Re: Voting (again), Doug Royer, 19:31
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore, 18:41
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore, 17:42
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch, 17:09
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch, 17:05
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore, 17:01
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore, 16:52
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker, 16:20
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch, 16:11
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch, 16:11
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore, 15:36
- Re: Voting (again), Sam Hartman, 14:38
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker, 14:35
- Re: Voting (again), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 14:20
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker, 14:07
- Re: Voting (again), Lakshminath Dondeti, 13:45
- Re: Voting (again), John C Klensin, 13:21
- Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Edward Lewis, 12:06
- Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Lakshminath Dondeti, 11:42
- Re: Voting (again), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 11:23
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker, 09:57
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore, 09:53
- Re: Voting (again), Sam Hartman, 09:14
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker, 09:09
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker, 06:25
April 19, 2005
- RE: Voting (again), Noel Chiappa, 18:10
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:09
- Re: Voting (again), william(at)elan.net, 11:02
- Re: Voting (again), Eliot Lear, 10:54
- Re: Voting Idea?, Dave Crocker, 10:50
- Re: Voting (again), william(at)elan.net, 10:37
- Re: Voting (again), Eliot Lear, 10:19
- Re: Another Bogus DNS wildcard ??, Bruce Lilly, 09:50
- RE: Voting (again), Bob Braden, 09:18
- RE: Voting (again), Fleischman, Eric, 09:15
- RE: Voting (again), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 07:14
- Re: Voting (again), Yakov Rekhter, 06:38
- RE: Voting (again), Noel Chiappa, 05:48
April 18, 2005
- Another Bogus DNS wildcard ??, Doug Royer, 23:11
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker, 22:12
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch, 10:21
- Re: Voting (again), Ted Faber, 08:07
- Re: Voting (again), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 06:21
- Re: Voting (again), Brian E Carpenter, 01:28
April 17, 2005
- Re: Voting (again), Steve Crocker, 18:41
- Re: Voting (again), Frank Ellermann, 18:11
- RE: Voting (again), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 17:27
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:16
- Re: IENs: 127, 117, 93, Bob Braden, 14:20
- Re: IENs: 127, 117, 93, Scott Bradner, 04:48
- Re: IENs: 127, 117, 93, Scott Bradner, 04:40
April 16, 2005
- Re: IENs: 127, 117, 93, Bill Manning, 20:01
- RE: Voting (again), Dave Crocker, 19:52
- RE: Voting (again), bill, 18:45
- RE: IENs: 127, 117, 93, bill, 18:40
- RE: Voting (again), Noel Chiappa, 18:23
- IENs: 127, 117, 93, Root Database Manager, 17:30
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:22
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:22
April 15, 2005
- Re: Voting (again), kent crispin, 23:04
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore, 21:32
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:16
- Re: As there a PERSON email address at the IESG?, Ted Hardie, 14:55
- Re: Voting (again), Sam Hartman, 14:44
- As there a PERSON email address at the IESG?, Doug Royer, 14:18
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore, 11:30
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:40
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore, 07:37
- WSIS [Re: Voting (again)], Brian E Carpenter, 07:23
April 13, 2005
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 22:20
- Re: Voting (again), Lakshminath Dondeti, 15:01
- Re: Voting (again), Frank Ellermann, 14:45
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:58
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch, 12:07
- Re: Voting (again), Lakshminath Dondeti, 12:04
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:51
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch, 11:28
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch, 11:22
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker, 11:15
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch, 10:58
- Re: Voting (again), Ari Ollikainen, 10:47
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:12
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker, 10:12
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch, 09:57
- Re: Voting (again), Brian E Carpenter, 02:50
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 02:50
April 12, 2005
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:24
- Re: Voting (again), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 18:20
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, ned . freed, 17:01
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Stephen Casner, 17:00
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Colin Perkins, 16:36
- Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:16
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Robert Elz, 15:50
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Colin Perkins, 14:33
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Robert Elz, 13:49
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Colin Perkins, 13:47
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Kireeti Kompella, 13:26
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Bruce Lilly, 11:54
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Colin Perkins, 11:10
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Colin Perkins, 11:10
- RE: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, ned . freed, 10:46
- RE: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Scott Hollenbeck, 10:35
- Re: IMS, IM-SSF, Jonathan Rosenberg, 10:31
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, ned . freed, 10:12
- Re: Please review updated 1id-guidelines, Bob Braden, 09:47
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Colin Perkins, 09:47
April 08, 2005
- I-D/RFC source formats, Bruce Lilly, 12:25
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bruce Lilly, 12:05
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bruce Lilly, 12:02
- Re: Voting Idea?, Bruce Lilly, 12:02
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Francis Dupont, 10:57
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' toInformational RFC, Bill Fenner, 10:17
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bill Fenner, 10:17
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bill Fenner, 10:13
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Alex Rousskov, 09:23
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-02.txt, Arun Sankar, 09:13
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-02.txt, Keith Moore, 09:13
- Re: Intermediate Drafts of network layer protocols, Joe Touch, 08:58
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' t o Informational RFC, Joe Touch, 08:51
- RE: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' t o Informational RFC, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 07:17
- RE: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bill Sommerfeld, 06:58
- RE: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' toInformational RFC, Elwyn davies, 06:40
- RE: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Elwyn davies, 06:38
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Eliot Lear, 06:16
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Stewart Bryant, 06:12
- RE: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' toInformational RFC, Lars-Erik Jonsson \(LU/EAB\), 06:07
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Scott W Brim, 05:32
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to ..., Scott Bradner, 04:52
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 04:43
- RE: Intermediate Drafts of network layer protocols, Elwyn davies, 04:08
- RE: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Elwyn davies, 03:32
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Stewart Bryant, 02:54
- Re: Intermediate Drafts of network layer protocols, Stewart Bryant, 02:54
April 07, 2005
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF DraftSubmission Toolset' to Informational RFC), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 16:53
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Alex Rousskov, 14:53
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Keith Moore, 14:16
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Alex Rousskov, 14:09
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-abnf-rfc2234bis-00.txt, Bruce Lilly, 12:56
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bruce Lilly, 10:51
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-02.txt, Keith Moore, 10:07
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-02.txt, Bruce Lilly, 09:57
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Jeroen Massar, 09:33
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Alex Rousskov, 09:24
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bruce Lilly, 08:27
- Re: Voting vs. reasoned debate vs. "rough consensus", Brian E Carpenter, 08:23
- Re: Voting Idea?, Sam Hartman, 08:12
- RE: Intermediate Drafts of network layer protocols, Arvind, Krishnamoorthy, 08:04
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 07:56
- Voting vs. reasoned debate vs. "rough consensus", Bruce Lilly, 07:54
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Thomas Narten, 07:00
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Alex Rousskov, 06:26
- Re: Intermediate Drafts of network layer protocols, Carl Malamud, 06:25
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Alex Rousskov, 06:22
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Alex Rousskov, 06:17
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Alex Rousskov, 06:14
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Alex Rousskov, 06:14
- Re: Intermediate Drafts of network layer protocols, Marshall Eubanks, 06:04
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Scott Bradner, 06:02
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF DraftSubmission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Jari Arkko, 05:58
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF DraftSubmission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Jeroen Massar, 05:55
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF DraftSubmission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Marshall Eubanks, 05:52
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF DraftSubmission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Pekka Savola, 05:20
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF DraftSubmission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Margaret Wasserman, 05:09
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF DraftSubmission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Thomas Narten, 04:43
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Thomas Narten, 04:24
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Brian E Carpenter, 01:20
- Re: Intermediate Drafts of network layer protocols, Brian E Carpenter, 01:17
- Intermediate Drafts of network layer protocols, Syed Farooq Ahmed, 00:23
April 06, 2005
- Re: Fw: Presence -Watcher clarification, Jonathan Rosenberg, 20:18
- Re: Last Call: 'Scripting Media Types' to Informational RFC, Bruce Lilly, 16:28
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Scott W Brim, 12:29
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 09:38
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bill Fenner, 09:38
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bruce Lilly, 08:23
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Eliot Lear, 07:55
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bill Fenner, 07:53
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bruce Lilly, 07:39
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Pekka Savola, 07:06
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Julian Reschke, 07:06
- Fw: Presence -Watcher clarification, Rg, 06:59
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bruce Lilly, 06:44
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF DraftSubmission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Brian E Carpenter, 06:24
- RE: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF DraftSubmission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\), 05:12
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Eliot Lear, 05:10
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bruce Lilly, 04:56
- Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Jeroen Massar, 03:26
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 02:54
April 05, 2005
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Frank Ellermann, 20:05
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Sandy Wills, 19:49
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Frank Ellermann, 19:17
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, ned . freed, 17:09
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Steven M. Bellovin, 16:41
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bruce Lilly, 15:14
April 04, 2005
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 18:26
- Paper on ATP; end to end security provided by ATP: where SHA1-80 is enough, Jason Gao, 17:55
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Ole Jacobsen, 17:12
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Anthony G. Atkielski, 16:51
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 16:41
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Anthony G. Atkielski, 15:53
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Anthony G. Atkielski, 15:53
- Re: What? No PPT or wireless? [Re: IETF63 wireless], Dave Crocker, 14:34
- IMS, IM-SSF, Nuno Novo, 13:57
- Call for nominations: IAOC positions selected by the NomCom, Danny McPherson, 11:19
- Re: Proceedings missing, Michael Lee, 07:04
- Proceedings missing, Edward Lewis, 06:58
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Benyamin Nasution, 04:43
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 01:17
April 03, 2005
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Eric Rescorla, 09:41
- Nowhere is perfect [Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?], Brian E Carpenter, 07:13
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, avri, 04:10
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Anthony G. Atkielski, 01:29
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Anthony G. Atkielski, 01:28
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Eric Rescorla, 00:53
- Re: New regulations for US Visa Waiver Programme (was RE: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usageby visitors? ), Brian E Carpenter, 00:51
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Eric Rescorla, 00:43
April 02, 2005
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Carsten Bormann, 22:17
- RE: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Christian Huitema, 17:17
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Dean Anderson, 15:52
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Bruce Lilly, 08:03
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Eric Rescorla, 07:32
- Re: New regulations for US Visa Waiver Programme (was RE: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usageby visitors? ), Henk Uijterwaal, 07:12
- RE: New regulations for US Visa Waiver Programme (was RE: frenchcrypto regulations relating to personal encryption usagebyvisitors? ), Elwyn davies, 07:03
- Re: New regulations for US Visa Waiver Programme (was RE: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usageby visitors? ), Jaap Akkerhuis, 06:42
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Sam Hartman, 06:37
- New regulations for US Visa Waiver Programme (was RE: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usageby visitors? ), Elwyn davies, 06:07
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Jaap Akkerhuis, 05:40
April 01, 2005
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Ole Jacobsen, 23:10
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Anthony G. Atkielski, 20:11
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Anthony G. Atkielski, 20:08
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Sam Hartman, 19:11
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Sam Hartman, 18:53
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Dean Anderson, 16:38
- french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Bill Sommerfeld, 11:17