Re: Voting (again)

Nobody died and made the IESG cop. They took it upon themselves, and
that's not how things (should) work in the IETF.


IESG is following RFC 2026, and it takes its responsibilities seriously.

Keith

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Voting (again), (continued) Re: Voting (again), Eliot Lear Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore Re: Voting (again), Jeffrey Hutzelman Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore <= Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch Re: Voting (again), Pekka Savola Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch Re: Voting (again), Fred Baker Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker Separated document review [Re: Voting (again)], Pekka Savola Re: Separated document review [Re: Voting (again)], Adrian Farrel Re: Separated document review [Re: Voting (again)], Pekka Savola

Previous by Date:	Re: Voting (again), Fred Baker
Next by Date:	Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch
Previous by Thread:	Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch
Next by Thread:	Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]