Only if we view this top-down. If the role of the ADs is to make sure a
doc gets reviewed, they can hand it to a WG or a separate "non WG set of
reviewers".
as I said before, this doesn't solve the problem, it just moves it.
there absolutely needs to be a program committee for documents if we care
at all about quality. it doesn' t have to be IESG, but any program committee
is going to have most of the problems that IESG has. and I don't believe
that you can entirely separate management/oversight and review.
Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf