I wasn't advocating for more ADs, but for more 'virtual' ADs, i.e., to
move the work of reviewing out of the ADs, and let the ADs distrbute
the
reviews and collect and interpret the results.
I would agree on one point. Document reviewers seem to me would
help. Most of the initial feedback (at least for my '1' case)
was editorial and not technical. The technical feedback came
later.
I can imagine that virtual ADs might be very useful for reviewing early
WG drafts (long before the WG thinks it is done), identifying
potentially contentious issues and needed cross-area review, giving
feedback to the authoring WGs about those, and informing the real ADs
about the state of the document.
Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf