ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC

2005-04-08 10:13:49
On Apr 8, 2005 5:27 AM, Scott W Brim <sbrim(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:
On 4/7/2005 10:36, Brian E Carpenter allegedly wrote:
prefer nroff: 8
prefer xml:  37
neither:      9

I wonder how many of those have actually written a draft using both?

I picked "neither" since I use both and don't have a strong
preference.  nroff gives me much more control over the actual
formatting, xml lets me leave the tool maintenance to someone else and
I do see the advantage of well-formed metadata.

(otoh I have nroff macros to help in writing MIBs, which e.g., create
the SEQUENCE so it's never out of sync with the objects in a table...
can't think of how I would do that in XML offhand)

  Bill

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>