In your previous mail you wrote:
I deliberately wanted to make the poll binary, but my
assumption is that 'neither' must mainly represent that
proprietary solution. I can't imagine many people generate
I-Ds using a plain text editor,
=> why? I used a plain text editor before moving to xml2rfc (xml edited
with a plain text editor too) because of the new boiler stuff pressure...
and intuitively OpenOffice doesn't seem likely either.
=> to prefer emacs to OOo is a subtle way to like open source (:-).
It's easy to create your own poll at the same site.
We're at 11/43/10 now, by the way. It looks as if XML suits
about 2/3 of our authors, but we have a substantial nroff
party.
=> nroff is not so bad. The problem is the community which supported it
moved to Latex many years ago... And for short I-Ds direct writing is
easier/faster/etc. BTW IMHO the best tool should be so painful that
I-Ds would be very small (:-)?
Regards
Francis(_dot_)Dupont(_at_)enst-bretagne(_dot_)fr
PS: what we need is a rfc2xml. It seems there is a secret rfc2nroff...
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf