-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Keith Moore wrote:
So the real requirement is to reduce the load the IETF places on an AD.
This seems like an extremely difficult problem to me. Most of IESG's
workload is in reviewing technical specifications. I don't see any way
to provide good quality technical specifications without a final review
by a group of technically adept individuals with a broad range of
expertise.
Other groups solve this by distributing that load - which also solves
the problem of individuals with bones to pick. They get outnumbered ;-)
To significantly reduce the load that the IETF places on an AD basically
means one or more of the following:
- fewer WGs (and a higher bar for chartering new WGs)
- fewer documents (say, a quota on the number of documents a WG can produce)
- shorter documents (say, a per-document page quota)
- fewer WG participants
- a further degradation in document quality
Why isn't a larger number of "ADs" - or, more specifically, removing the
review process from the ADs and having a real review group, the solution
here?
Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCbsnnE5f5cImnZrsRApu7AKDT9pn3iyHlEWoMDUj7MobaTt42SACdH+66
CndiC35Goq89fYa7ORiYh9o=
=wcAv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf