RE: Voting (again)
2005-04-13 12:58:33
Nomcon can use any mechanism they like to select candidates, it makes no
difference.
Nomcon is not accountable to anyone by design, its decisions are not
binding on anyone as a result.
To have authority you have to accept accountability.
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On
Behalf Of Lakshminath Dondeti
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 3:00 PM
To: Joe Touch
Cc: Dave Crocker; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: Voting (again)
Nomcom does use voting. Please see RFC 3777.
I am a member of the current Nomcom, and we tried consensus first and
then used voting to reach our decisions. (I even learnt how
Condorcet
voting works :-)).
best,
Lakshminath
Joe Touch wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dave Crocker wrote:
When the IETF pays for the 60% (80%, 100%, take your pick)
of an AD's
salary, they can elect ADs.
Funding of candidates isn't the issue.
I disagree; short of funding candidates or reducing the
workload (the
latter, IMO, would be more appropriate), the list of willing
candidates
is a significant part of the problem.
...
The problem with voting is that the IETF does not have a membership
list, so
there is no real basis for running a "vote". The nomcom
process is intended as
a surrogate, randomly selecting motivated "representatives".
That is a kind of a voting process. First, you have to have
attended a
certain number of previous IETFs to be eligible for NomCom
participation (which is not unlike the 'attend X meetings before you
can vote' rule in the IEEE and other organizations). How the NomCom
reaches consensus is not specified, but may involve votes.
Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCXVscE5f5cImnZrsRAgOLAKDIKgovQNCrnZF3BREc8fV2IbH2JACg/ti4
kiKmTf6DCHtGINs/JKMEeCs=
=CFvB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Voting (again), (continued)
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Voting (again),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip <=
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Voting (again), Frank Ellermann
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
|
|
|