-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dave Crocker wrote:
When the IETF pays for the 60% (80%, 100%, take your pick) of an AD's
salary, they can elect ADs.
Funding of candidates isn't the issue.
I disagree; short of funding candidates or reducing the workload (the
latter, IMO, would be more appropriate), the list of willing candidates
is a significant part of the problem.
...
The problem with voting is that the IETF does not have a membership list, so
there is no real basis for running a "vote". The nomcom process is intended
as
a surrogate, randomly selecting motivated "representatives".
That is a kind of a voting process. First, you have to have attended a
certain number of previous IETFs to be eligible for NomCom participation
(which is not unlike the 'attend X meetings before you can vote' rule in
the IEEE and other organizations). How the NomCom reaches consensus is
not specified, but may involve votes.
Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCXVscE5f5cImnZrsRAgOLAKDIKgovQNCrnZF3BREc8fV2IbH2JACg/ti4
kiKmTf6DCHtGINs/JKMEeCs=
=CFvB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf