Let's assume that the crypto regulations are a red herring as far
as Paris is concerned. I'd like to state the obvious - every location
we choose for an IETF is a compromise. Jordi Palet took on the job of
writing a first draft of site selection criteria. Things like visa
requirements and crypto regulations should surely figure in that,
and so should travel time, weather, etc. But we have to give a lot
of weight to meeting facilities and the budget, as well.
Brian
avri(_at_)psg(_dot_)com wrote:
On 3 apr 2005, at 04.39, Eric Rescorla wrote:
I'm not sure what you think the misunderstanding is. That people
are often self-interested and prefer to minimize travel time?
I doubt that's a misunderstanding at all.
I don't agree with this assessment. I think that if the decision where
to continue the North American meeting allocation, just requiring them
all to be in Canada, most of the complaints would come from people in
the US and not from Europeans even though the US travel time would still
be optimized.
a.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf