Hi,
My comment on the "Email Submission Between Independent Networks
draft-hutzler-spamops-04" document :
In the part 4 (external submission), the document offers no recommendation
concerning the blocking of SMTP port 25.
Even if the ISP decides not to block it, this ISP should be covered by this
future RFC to legitimate its choice of closing port 25.(a single MAY can be
enough)
Regards,
Eric Edelstein
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Dave Crocker [mailto:dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net]
Envoyé : lundi 13 juin 2005 20:44
À : members(_at_)maawg(_dot_)org
Objet : The IETF needs your input about the Spamops document
Importance : Haute
Folks,
This is a request for you action:
A draft specification has been submitted to the IETF for standardization as a
"Best Current Practices".
Information about the document is at:
<http://mipassoc.org/spamops/>
The document is in the final stages of a public "Last Call" process, during
which the IETF's management Steering Group obtains input about interest in the
document and hears about possible problems with it.
This document did not get developed within the IETF. So there is no record of
community interest.
Consequently it is particularly important to have active postings from the
broad Internet community, expressing their assessment of the document, notably
including any plans to implement the specifications.
This document is a limited, first-step in specifying voluntary standards for
service providers, in their cross-net email operations.
Please send your comments to:
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
cc: iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Thanks.
d/
---
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
+1.408.246.8253
dcrocker a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf