We can reasonably delegate a determination of
definitional adequacy to an individual, but decisions
about "good" or "bad", or recommendations to use or not
use something, require community consensus.
nice, simple language. seems to capture the distinction -- and the
requirement -- nicely.
I disagree. We normally require a higher standard than community consensus
for technical specifications - we require both consensus and technical
soundness.
Technical soundness is determined by both community feedback and IESG review.
I don't see why we should impose a lesser standard for IP options.
Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf