ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: 'Email Submission Between Independent Networks' to BCP

2005-07-03 18:54:15
"Simon" == Simon Josefsson <jas(_at_)extundo(_dot_)com> writes:

    Simon> "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt(_at_)OpenLDAP(_dot_)org> writes:
    >> It is my recommendation that the mandatory-to-implement
    >> "strong" authentication mechanism for this protocol be either:
    >> DIGEST-MD5 (with a mandate that implementations support its
    >> data security layers) TLS+PLAIN (with a recommendation that
    >> PLAIN not be used when TLS is not in use).

    Simon> I don't think recommending the DIGEST-MD5 security layers
    Simon> is a good idea.

    Simon> The integrity layer is hard coded to be HMAC-MD5, with keys
    Simon> derived using a home-grown key-derivation function based on
    Simon> MD5.


I think the key derivation function used by digest-md5 is sound given
reasonable assumptions.  I am reasonably certain this is true under
the random oracle assumption but believe it may be true under weaker
assumptions.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Last Call: 'Email Submission Between Independent Networks' to BCP, Sam Hartman <=