ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic

2005-07-11 22:01:41
Henning,

No, lack of action by the community to request moving documents to 
Historic.

There seem to be a number of these housekeeping tasks that have almost 
no benefit to the individual, have increasing costs and ever longer-term 
commitments and thus, not surprisingly, don't get done on a regular 
basis. Promotion and demotion of standards are prime examples, reviewing 
is another.

Besides appealing to community spirit, other organizations deal with 
that by deputizing individuals that get recognized for doing this type 
of work in general, in one way or the other. This can take the "New 
York's Strongest" (Dept. of Sanitation) or the "XYZ 
secretary" approach.

In many cases, people do unpleasant or boring or no-immediate-reward 
tasks in hope of getting promoted later - this is why I suggested WG 
secretaries earlier and maybe why having elected IESG secretaries or the 
IETF Dept. of Public Works ("just leave your old standards at the curb") 
might be needed.

Have you seen draft-ietf-newtrk-cruft-00?  It proposes something along
these lines.

John

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>