At 17:23 14/07/2005, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Since we don't have a WG for this, the IETF list is the only place
right now.
Brian
I would recommand a WG. This would permit to have a merge of the current
propositions, to engage into more complex issues such as:
- compatibility with externally defined elements (ex. ISO 3166 discussed in
RFC 1591)
- political disclaimer when a registry may be construed as a support for a
political, commercial or technical vision.
- experimentation
- registry system architecture and generic registry solution
- multilingual support in spite of the current state of the art technology
limitations
- harmonisation with ISO 11179, inter-registry relations
- transition from namespace towards ASCII non dependent codespaces
- distributed registries, relations with private or experimental/temporary
registries, registries specialised restrictions
- reporting on registries updates and corrections
- registry managers committees selections
- updates via Working Group RFCs
etc.
jfc
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf