Dear Harald,
I agree, with one edit - s/to WG/to WG early in the process/.
(note is long - summary: Review panel SHOULD, in my opinion, be able
to send back documents to WG without it being a Big Deal. At least
once.)
The part where I stroke out about us continuing to think that
documents coming to a Full Stop in the IESG, or in the SRP, being the
common path we optimize for is that the Review Panel, as described in
the current draft, is a LATE review entity, and we don't like late
surprises (for example, the words "guess again" when the WG thinks
it's through).
I honestly hope the SRP spends some time spinning up an ICARish
mechanism for EARLY review, and that the SRP spends its time reading
reviews from ICARish reviewers that say, "these guys used to be
idiots, but they've gotten a LOT smarter - please check the 02 and 04
text in section 6.3 for proof".
And the SRP can spend its time spot-checking drafts that have been
seriously CARDed (in the SIR sense), and adjourn early to the bars.
And what a wonderful world that would be...
Spencer
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf