The general area is a small issue in the big picture. If it isn't needed
any more, the IESG can axe it in a split second.
I think a wiser policy might be to keep the area open with no WGs. It
isn't, after all, the Process Area, and it might come in handy one day,
as Avri suggests.
Brian
avri doria wrote:
Hi,
in John's formulation, the process work of the general area withers away
- or at least moves to a different corner of the world.
so what happens to the general area?
one suggestion is to axe it.
my suggestion would be for that role to be staffed by a generalist who
is comfortable with complexity in its many network manifestations. this
area could then house those groups that need to deal with complex issues
that now often get force fit into the more specific areas.
a.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf