On Aug 26, 2005, at 9:38 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
Mark Baugher wrote:
I don't necessarily see the two needing to be combined so closely.
perhaps not, but if DKIM doesn't address either phishing, spam, or
viruses, and it doesn't authenticate content authorship, what good is
it?
I said that I don't think phishing should be combined so closely with
the problem of spam. But you throw in viruses and claim that it
doesn't address any of the combined three. Where's this coming from?
I think you're wrong: DKIM does address spam and email-borne viruses.
I think it addresses phishing spam as well but the phishing problem has
yet another complication.
Mark
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf