Thank you Mr. Chairman.
I read your explanation. And I try to think the best protocol. Just
for that case.
. the person who thinks he is hurt castigates Dean.
. he sues Dean.
. he starts the judgement against Dean.
. he writes the accusation.
. he asks the Jury to decide without decorum and defense.
. he belongs to Judges.
. he belongs to appeal Judges.
I do not know that person, but when is the process to castigate him if
he is wrong? Who would then pay damages to Dean? Dean is technically
in desadvantage.
Then I must oppose.
Eduardo Mendez
2005/10/10, Brian E Carpenter <brc(_at_)zurich(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com>:
Eduardo Mendez wrote:
Can someone explain what is this?
I assume you have read RFC 3683. That should explain what this is.
Is it issued by the IESG?
Yes.
Is this a procecussion?
Do you mean "prosecution"? No. It's a proposed action under RFC 3683.
Where is the defense of Dean?
That is up to him.
Has the Last Call started?
Yes. This message started it.
When does it finish?
06 November 2005, as stated in the message.
Brian
-
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf