hi frank,
Tschofenig, Hannes wrote:
The values listed in the "Location Types Registry" document
are not displayed to the user. As such, we don't cover
internationalization support.
That wasn't clear from the draft under discussion. It should
get some "I18N considerations" explaining why that's no issue.
we will reflect this aspect.
If there are better definitions please let us know.
Maybe the WiKi dictionary has a category "location" (?)
i search for a while and found interesting pages but unfortuately not
related to this topic.
i got the impression that some folks had very specific suggestions
already in mind in order to provide constructive feedback.
We thought that FCFS would be an acceptable policy. Some
people had a different view about it.
Not limited to registration request DoS attacks on IANA, yes.
Fine. I have no problems changing it to expert review.
Where do you expect to find volunteers for an expert review
of a location dictionary ? From two "expert review" lists I
know (langtags and charsets) one works at the moment, I'm
not sure about the other.
"Expert review" is essentially a filter protecting IANA from
some really bad ideas, but it's also an exercise in TINSTAAFL
- set up mailing list, appoint reviewer, handle appeals, etc.
do you think expert review is ok? (just to understand you right)
i thought about the Geopriv working group or its designated successor.
ciao
hannes
Bye, Frank
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf