It is not clear to me what I ought to do at this point. I will
conduct the Last Call if requested by the document authors, but I
need exact text for it.
Russ
At 04:22 AM 2/15/2006, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Sam Hartman wrote:
"Brian" == Brian E Carpenter <brc(_at_)zurich(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com> writes:
Brian> My point is only that while we have an active WG looking at
Brian> the question of license terms for the use of text from
Brian> RFCs, it wouldn't be right for the IESG to unilaterally
Brian> approve a new policy, even for a single draft. I don't
Brian> believe the approved text does set a new policy.
Brian> Brian
I don't think the proposed change from one of the authors does either.
I think it is well within what we have recently approved.
I think it's linked to the question we're discussing in IPR about
relaxing our change control, which is why I'm hesitant. Simon is
correct of course; if such a change was successfully Last Called the
IESG would (IMHO) be entitled to approve it.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf