ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.)

2006-03-28 16:09:12
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Mark Andrews wrote:


The other side of the coin is the fact that many devices will effectively
require no more than a /128 because of the way they connect up to the
network. For example cell phones will be serviced on plans where the
subscription fee is per device. Verizon, T-mobile, cingular need no more
than one /64 each to service those networks.

        Well I see cell phones as routers for the on body IPv6 bluetooth
        network.

I find it interesting that our vision is frequently so short-sighted that we can't even envision in the course of an arguement the applications that are possible today let alone the ones that people will want in the future.

        I see cell phones as routers for your laptop.

they are now really...

        Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews(_at_)isc(_dot_)org

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joel Jaeggli           Unix Consulting         
joelja(_at_)darkwing(_dot_)uoregon(_dot_)edu
GPG Key Fingerprint:     5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf