Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
I'm not saying that these people expected the internet to melt down by
supporting this policy, but that's exactly the problem. Within the
IETF, we've been working long and hard to find a way to allow for
multihoming that we KNOW won't melt the internet, and now just as these
efforts are getting close to paying off (shim6)
In case you (IETF) diddn't get the memo, the operational community has
flat out rejected shim6 in it's current form as a replacement
for PI.
This failure of leadership from the IETF to provide a roadmap for a
viable alternative to PI is a factor in the support for going with
the current technology.
- Kevin
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf