Earlier today, Ray suggested that only a small fraction of everyone who
went to Dallas has taken the 10 minutes needed to provide feedback on
the meeting.
I am posting this message to ask "Why so little response?"
Is it because only two hundred people read the IETF discussion list? If
so, then maybe we have all the response we can expect, and should be
happy with it.
If, on the other hand, we know a thousand people monitor the list, then
I return to "Why so little response?"
Are we surveyed-out, or did the survey ask too many questions, or what?
For the record, and for transparency, I did the survey last week. Doing
it was relatively painless, and I don't think it took more than 10
minutes.
Regards,
Ed Juskevicius
-----Original Message-----
From: Ray Pelletier [mailto:rpelletier(_at_)isoc(_dot_)org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 6:48 AM
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: IETF Meeting Survey - Last Call
All;
More than 1,250 of you attended IETF 65 in Dallas and many others
attended sessions remotely. Yet only 155 of you have responded to a
survey intended to make future meeting experiences more successful.
There are only 74 days left before IETF 66 in Montreal, only 74 days
during which there may be the opportunity to effect improvements.
Again, your participation is anonymous and your candor is most welcome.
You can help by taking this short survey at:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=649182049947
At the end of the survey you will be able to see the survey results to
date.
I do appreciate the help.
Thanks
Ray Pelletier
IETF Administrative Director
iad(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf