ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Image attachments to ASCII RFCs (was: Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats))

2006-06-18 05:31:53
On 18-jun-2006, at 13:23, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:

Show me a PDF viewer written by a 16-year-old in BASIC, or
whatever it is that bored kids write software in these days.

I am more concerned about making a document readable and intelligible by a 16 year old doing a high school class than the somewhat bizare notion of them writing text editors for use by people writing them.

It's not _that_ bizarre. Suppose that we decide to allow publishing RFCs in PDF only. Suppose that within the next few years some company comes up with a replacement for PDF that is better is some important regard so that everyone switches to the new format. Suppose that a decade later, someone wants to read one of those RFCs that is only available in PDF. At that point, it will be extremely hard to do that, because all the new software doesn't support PDF anymore, or in a way that's too limited to be useful. Using old software that with good PDF support isn't an option either, because very little software still runs after a decade or so of OS updates. And writing a PDF viewer just for this isn't really an option either, while writing a viewer or even editor that can handle today's RFC format is.

The steps required to format an RFC nicely are far from trivial.

It's simple enough, it just takes a lot of effort without good tools.

But I'm still not sure what problem exactly we're trying to solve.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf