Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASC

Julian Reschke wrote:
> Joe Touch schrieb:
...
> > And I'm worried about changes to XML that render the result
> > uncompilable, not minor text formatting changes. See the changes to 2629
> > (sometimes referred to as 2629bis, although no I-D has been issued - and
> > we're currently using this 'bis' version) noted on the xml2rfc pages.
> > What happens when a real 'bis' WG is created? will the current changes
> > be supported into the future or not?
> Do you have any evidence of non-backwards compatible changes that
> occurred in the past?
As I noted off-list, I had this experience, but didn't bother saving the
failed file; that was the 'straw' that shifted me over to revising the
Word template, and I didn't save the failed version (unfortunately).

Joe

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf