Therefore, I propose the following:
(1) Andrew's decision stands. Under RFC 3777, the only recourse available
...
(2) Text is added to the next version of the selection process to addresss
No one has expressed a concern that there was an attempt, here, to game
the process, or that re-doing selection will actually produce a
problematic nomcom membership. So either retaining the original list or
re-doing the selections results in an acceptable set of nomcom members.
The wastefulness and disruption of unnecessarily re-doing selection is
unfortunate, but hardly fatal.
Creating better text for the future is certainly a good idea.
And, yes, this is a long-winded version of:
+1
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf