I further agree with Phillip (and Richard) that this is not an IAB
or even a Nomcom chair decision
I disagree. The chair of a committee should have some freedom to
decide what to do in cases not covered by the RFC. The decision he made
(rerun the algorithm with correct input data) is a reasonable one by
any standard. Let's just accept his decision and go on with our work.
There are, of course, other solutions, but I seriously doubt that a
community discussion will ever lead to consensus on which one is best.
So, let's not have this discussion (*)
I disagree further with Phil that this can set a precedent for rerunning
the algorithm in the case where a "unacceptable to some" member is
selected in the NOMCOM. That is something completely different.
Henk
(*) This won't happen but thanks to procmail, I won't see it...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net
RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.amsterdamned.org/~henk
P.O.Box 10096 Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414
1001 EB Amsterdam 1016 AB Amsterdam Fax: +31.20.5354445
The Netherlands The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1160438400 + 381600 = 1160820000.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf