ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: feed-license-08

2006-09-05 16:14:58
Hello Frank,

Yes, there has been some feedback and additional discussion posted to
the atom-syntax list, part of which covers this new section.  That forum
would likely be the best place to discuss.  That said, however, good
suggestion.  Thank you for taking a look.

- James

Frank Ellermann wrote:
James M Snell wrote:

a primary goal of mine is to remain consistent with rfc4287.

Hi, I've seen the "post last call" update (draft -08) triggered
by the GenArt review, where you say "are not legally binding".

How about "might be not legally binding" ?  "Are not" sounds
like "forget it".

Frank (IANAL)



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>