Hello Frank,
Yes, there has been some feedback and additional discussion posted to
the atom-syntax list, part of which covers this new section. That forum
would likely be the best place to discuss. That said, however, good
suggestion. Thank you for taking a look.
- James
Frank Ellermann wrote:
James M Snell wrote:
a primary goal of mine is to remain consistent with rfc4287.
Hi, I've seen the "post last call" update (draft -08) triggered
by the GenArt review, where you say "are not legally binding".
How about "might be not legally binding" ? "Are not" sounds
like "forget it".
Frank (IANAL)
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf