IETF Discussion (date)
September 29, 2006
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, todd glassey, 19:50
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, John C Klensin, 15:58
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 15:18
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Bob Braden, 14:51
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Eliot Lear, 14:40
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Eric Rosen, 08:57
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Thomas Narten, 08:32
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, John C Klensin, 07:50
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Eliot Lear, 06:54
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Keith Moore, 06:39
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Dave Cridland, 03:47
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Keith Moore, 00:56
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Eliot Lear, 00:56
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Eliot Lear, 00:19
September 28, 2006
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Eliot Lear, 23:27
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 21:05
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Frank Ellermann, 20:39
- Re: IETF-related spam from JFC Morfin, David Kessens, 15:19
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Sam Hartman, 12:50
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, C. M. Heard, 12:39
- Re: "zone" is not a DNS name semantic, David W. Hankins, 11:21
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Ralph Droms, 09:52
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), John C Klensin, 09:29
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, John Leslie, 09:29
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Keith Moore, 09:03
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Eliot Lear, 08:55
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, John C Klensin, 08:53
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Keith Moore, 08:32
- Re: IETF-related spam from JFC Morfin, Tony Finch, 08:03
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Eliot Lear, 07:55
- Re: IETF-related spam from JFC Morfin, Theodore Tso, 07:49
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Keith Moore, 07:25
- Re: IETF-related spam from JFC Morfin, Jefsey_Morfin, 07:18
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Ned Freed, 06:40
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, John C Klensin, 06:11
- IETF-related spam from JFC Morfin, Tony Finch, 04:59
September 27, 2006
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Frank Ellermann, 21:35
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Sam Hartman, 20:28
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 15:45
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Mark Andrews, 14:38
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 12:51
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Keith Moore, 11:36
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), John C Klensin, 11:36
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), John C Klensin, 11:17
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Matt Larson, 11:10
- Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, bmanning, 10:59
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Harald Alvestrand, 10:49
- "zone" is not a DNS name semantic, Dave Crocker, 10:36
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Matt Larson, 10:05
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), David W. Hankins, 09:54
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Dave Crocker, 08:44
- Re: Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Bill Fenner, 08:33
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Dave Crocker, 08:12
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), John C Klensin, 07:55
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Dave Crocker, 06:53
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Jefsey_Morfin, 06:00
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), John C Klensin, 05:54
- As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Eliot Lear, 02:51
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Frank Ellermann, 02:40
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Stig Venaas, 01:49
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), John C Klensin, 01:15
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Stig Venaas, 00:24
September 26, 2006
- Re: 25th Anniversary!, Dave Crocker, 17:54
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Frank Ellermann, 14:33
- IDN effort has ballooned in scope without involving relevant additional review, Sam Hartman, 13:45
- Re: 25th Anniversary!, Andrew G. Malis, 13:45
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Fred Baker, 13:43
- Re: 25th Anniversary!, Ole Jacobsen, 13:24
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Frank Ellermann, 13:24
- Re: 25th Anniversary!, Andrew G. Malis, 13:08
- Re: 25th Anniversary!, stephen wolff, 12:52
- RE: 25th Anniversary!, Bob Braden, 12:19
- RE: 25th Anniversary!, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:10
- Re: 25th Anniversary!, Dave Crocker, 12:08
- Re: 25th Anniversary!, Jeffrey I. Schiller, 11:52
- Re: 25th Anniversary!, Bob Braden, 11:42
- Re: 25th Anniversary!, Noel Chiappa, 08:19
- RE: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 anddraft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:36
- Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, Harald Alvestrand, 07:29
- 25th Anniversary!, rpelletier, 07:29
- Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, John C Klensin, 06:02
- Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, Frank Ellermann, 04:15
September 25, 2006
- Re: Siemens to Host IETF 67, Fred Baker, 23:13
- Siemens to Host IETF 67, rpelletier, 22:57
- Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 11:46
- Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, Lisa Dusseault, 11:24
- Re: the pattern on this list (was: Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)), Jefsey_Morfin, 05:07
September 24, 2006
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Steven M. Bellovin, 16:40
- the pattern on this list (was: Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)), Keith Moore, 12:30
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Dave Crocker, 12:11
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Harald Alvestrand, 12:05
- Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, Sam Hartman, 11:42
September 23, 2006
- Re: Newtrk and ISDs, Frank Ellermann, 21:36
- Out-of-Office AutoReply: I-D was expired, Ted Hardie, 21:13
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), John Leslie, 11:10
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), John C Klensin, 10:02
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Dave Crocker, 08:17
- Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03:59
- Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, Julian Reschke, 02:34
September 22, 2006
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Sam Hartman, 15:53
- Re: Looking forward not back, John C Klensin, 14:36
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), David Kessens, 14:10
- Looking forward not back, Sam Hartman, 13:45
- Re: RFC/Protocol Quantification, Frank Ellermann, 08:31
- RFC/Protocol Quantification, Sreevathsa, 06:25
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Jefsey_Morfin, 05:17
September 21, 2006
- RFC/Protocol Quantification, Sreevathsa, 22:39
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 21:09
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Theodore Tso, 19:59
- Re: Newtrk and ISDs (was: Re: Facts, please not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Jefsey_Morfin, 16:49
- Re: Newtrk and ISDs (was: Re: Facts, please not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Fred Baker, 16:24
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Margaret Wasserman, 15:24
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Sam Hartman, 15:24
- Re: IANA XML registries, Jefsey_Morfin, 07:04
- Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, JFC Morfin, 07:04
- Newtrk and ISDs (was: Re: Facts, please not handwaving ..., Scott Bradner, 05:29
- Newtrk and ISDs (was: Re: Facts, please not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], John C Klensin, 05:18
- Re: IANA XML registries, Peter Dambier, 03:35
- BCCed messages, was Re: IANA XML registries, Tony Finch, 03:17
September 20, 2006
- IANA XML registries, JFC Morfin, 18:46
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Sam Hartman, 18:17
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Sam Hartman, 18:06
- Re: The BOF wiki, Dave Crocker, 10:06
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Bernard Desruisseaux, 08:31
- Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, JFC Morfin, 05:35
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Scott Bradner, 05:24
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Jefsey_Morfin, 05:19
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Eliot Lear, 05:19
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Brian E Carpenter, 05:04
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Spencer Dawkins, 05:04
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Eliot Lear, 02:51
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Eliot Lear, 02:35
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Dave Cridland, 02:21
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Brian E Carpenter, 02:03
September 19, 2006
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Dave Crocker, 18:16
- Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Russ Allbery, 16:18
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Sam Hartman, 12:34
- Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Sam Hartman, 12:25
- Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Dave Cridland, 12:14
- RE: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Gray, Eric, 11:59
- Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Jeffrey Altman, 11:52
- Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Harald Alvestrand, 11:38
- RE: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:30
- RE: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:18
- RE: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Gray, Eric, 11:03
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Dave Crocker, 11:03
- Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Robert Sayre, 10:57
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Brian E Carpenter, 08:37
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Henning Schulzrinne, 08:28
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Eliot Lear, 08:24
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving, Jefsey_Morfin, 04:30
- Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Tony Finch, 02:57
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Brian E Carpenter, 01:55
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Julian Reschke, 00:22
- security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Harald Alvestrand, 00:20
September 18, 2006
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Robert Sayre, 23:26
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Russ Allbery, 22:49
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Robert Sayre, 21:47
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], grenville armitage, 19:41
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving, Frank Ellermann, 19:38
- RE: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:14
- Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, Theodore Tso, 18:56
- Re: Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Bill Fenner, 07:20
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Jefsey_Morfin, 03:59
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Eliot Lear, 01:14
- Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Brian E Carpenter, 00:24
September 15, 2006
- Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an openElection Process, todd glassey, 17:02
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Processratherthansome, todd glassey, 10:32
- Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, todd glassey, 10:21
- Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, Andy Bierman, 08:56
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, todd glassey, 08:53
- Flaw in the design of NoteWell makes Notewell Not Well., todd glassey, 08:53
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, todd glassey, 08:53
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, todd glassey, 08:26
- Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:20
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:08
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, Jefsey_Morfin, 06:53
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, Nelson, David, 05:42
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, Noel Chiappa, 05:12
- Re: Specifying a state machine: ASCII-based languages, Stewart Bryant, 03:51
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Eliot Lear, 03:15
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, Yaakov Stein, 02:42
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Dave Cridland, 02:00
- Re: Specifying a state machine: ASCII-based languages, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 01:11
September 14, 2006
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 21:06
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Noel Chiappa, 19:56
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Joel M. Halpern, 18:36
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:33
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Joel M. Halpern, 17:40
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:24
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather thansome, Randy Presuhn, 11:53
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, bmanning, 11:29
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, bmanning, 11:29
- Re: Specifying a state machine: ASCII-based languages, Frank Ellermann, 11:26
- Re: Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 10:47
- Re: Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthan some, todd glassey, 09:17
- Re: Specifying a state machine: ASCII-based languages, Stewart Bryant, 09:01
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey, 08:49
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey, 08:49
- Re: Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, Brian E Carpenter, 07:47
- Re: Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, Tim Chown, 05:40
- Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, todd glassey, 04:47
September 12, 2006
- RE: what happened to newtrk?, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 16:06
- RE: what happened to newtrk?, John C Klensin, 15:10
- help, Sheikh, Usman Fakhar \(UMKC-Student\), 13:52
- Re: Specifying a state machine: ASCII-based languages, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 13:33
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Steven M. Bellovin, 13:33
- RE: what happened to newtrk?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:31
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Fred Baker, 13:31
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Eliot Lear, 13:31
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, John C Klensin, 11:56
- Re: Please make the madness stop (was: a whole bunch of flames), Ted Faber, 10:33
- Re: Please make the madness stop (was: a whole bunch of flames), todd glassey, 09:49
- RE: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:54
- IPv6 communication, thekkayil.joy, 07:23
- Please make the madness stop (was: a whole bunch of flames), Spencer Dawkins, 04:15
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Theodore Tso, 02:21
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Jefsey_Morfin, 01:03
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Brian E Carpenter, 00:48
September 11, 2006
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Carl Malamud, 18:03
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Carl Malamud, 16:59
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Jefsey_Morfin, 16:55
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Sam Hartman, 14:45
- Re: Constant flux (was: Why cant the IETF embrace an open ElectionProcess [...]), todd glassey, 13:07
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, todd glassey, 13:07
- Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Pekka Savola, 10:35
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, todd glassey, 10:32
- Constant flux (was: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process [...]), Frank Ellermann, 10:32
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, todd glassey, 09:54
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, todd glassey, 09:42
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, Rob Evans, 09:42
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, todd glassey, 09:15
- Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, todd glassey, 08:29
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, Noel Chiappa, 08:26
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey, 08:26
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Brian E Carpenter, 08:25
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Theodore Tso, 08:25
- appeals, JFC Morfin, 08:25
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Randy Presuhn, 08:25
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey, 08:25
September 09, 2006
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, John C Klensin, 11:52
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, John C Klensin, 11:51
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Frank Ellermann, 11:51
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Ned Freed, 11:51
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, C. M. Heard, 11:51
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:51
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Christian Huitema, 11:51
September 08, 2006
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker, 08:58
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Brian E Carpenter, 08:35
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:14
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker, 08:04
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 07:53
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Ned Freed, 07:45
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:20
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Brian E Carpenter, 05:36
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Frank Ellermann, 00:26
September 07, 2006
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Frank Ellermann, 23:00
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Christian Huitema, 21:27
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 21:11
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 20:31
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 20:30
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:16
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Frank Ellermann, 20:03
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Frank Ellermann, 18:53
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Christian Huitema, 17:29
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Sam Hartman, 17:14
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 17:14
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Kurt D. Zeilenga, 17:14
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 16:58
- Re: RFC 2195, Frank Ellermann, 16:12
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), John C Klensin, 16:10
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Frank Ellermann, 15:25
- RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Kurt D. Zeilenga, 14:38
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, John C Klensin, 13:43
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Responses, Marshall Eubanks, 11:50
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, bmanning, 10:12
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, bmanning, 10:12
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, bmanning, 10:12
- Re: [mpls] Re: Last Call: 'Label Switching Router Self-Test' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-self-test) (2), George Swallow, 09:53
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey, 09:12
- Re: Last Call: 'Label Switching Router Self-Test' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-self-test) (2), Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\), 09:12
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008, 08:52
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Responses, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 08:25
- Re: Last Call: 'Label Switching Router Self-Test' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-self-test), Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\), 06:10
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Pekka Savola, 00:21
September 06, 2006
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Pekka Savola, 23:35
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Stewart Bryant, 23:20
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Eliot Lear, 22:48
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Ralph Droms, 19:28
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Jefsey_Morfin, 16:33
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 16:33
- RFC Editor RFP Responses, rpelletier, 15:38
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:11
- Re: Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre, 13:58
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Ned Freed, 13:29
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre, 13:23
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre, 13:17
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman, 13:17
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman, 12:57
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre, 12:35
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman, 12:11
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre, 11:59
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Keith Moore, 11:46
- Re: Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre, 11:30
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Keith Moore, 11:25
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker, 11:07
- Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer, Ted Hardie, 11:07
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Eliot Lear, 10:56
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:50
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:27
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Jefsey_Morfin, 10:19
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Jefsey_Morfin, 10:19
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker, 10:15
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Ned Freed, 09:40
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker, 09:34
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey, 09:34
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre, 09:11
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:11
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Brian E Carpenter, 09:10
- RE: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:05
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker, 09:04
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Lars Eggert, 08:52
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Keith Moore, 08:45
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre, 07:16
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman, 06:59
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman, 06:38
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Frank Ellermann, 04:56
- RFC 2195 (was Re: what happened to newtrk?), Alexey Melnikov, 04:35
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Eliot Lear, 04:28
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Brian E Carpenter, 04:28
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Brian E Carpenter, 04:18
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Brian E Carpenter, 04:06
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Jefsey_Morfin, 04:00
- RE: what happened to newtrk?, Pasi.Eronen, 03:36
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Edward Lewis, 03:27
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Brian E Carpenter, 02:58
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Lars Eggert, 02:52
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Brian E Carpenter, 02:24
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Frank Ellermann, 02:09
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Stewart Bryant, 00:58
September 05, 2006
- Decision to Reset the NomCom Process, Andrew Lange, 23:27
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre, 23:16
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations'to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Randy Presuhn, 22:08
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, C. M. Heard, 21:51
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Sam Hartman, 20:59
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman, 20:59
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackofcommunicaiton here..., Richard Shockey, 17:03
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Frank Ellermann, 16:45
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Theodore Tso, 16:14
- Re: feed-license-08, James M Snell, 16:14
- feed-license-08 (was: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license)), Frank Ellermann, 15:15
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, John C Klensin, 15:01
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Jefsey_Morfin, 14:55
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to belackofcommunicaiton here..., Al Arsenault, 14:17
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Lakshminath Dondeti, 14:14
- RE: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations'to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:12
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackofcommunicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:59
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Sandy Wills, 13:49
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Jari Arkko, 13:42
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Lakshminath Dondeti, 13:19
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman, 12:57
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker, 12:47
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:47
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Keith Moore, 12:47
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Jari Arkko, 12:38
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., todd glassey, 12:32
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:31
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, John C Klensin, 12:18
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Keith Moore, 12:11
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Keith Moore, 11:59
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Keith Moore, 11:58
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., John C Klensin, 11:52
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre, 11:42
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communication here..., todd glassey, 11:38
- Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker, 11:36
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Jefsey_Morfin, 11:24
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communication here..., Fleischman, Eric, 11:17
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., todd glassey, 10:58
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Stewart Bryant, 10:52
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Stewart Bryant, 10:41
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman, 10:41
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Keith Moore, 10:11
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:04
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, todd glassey, 10:04
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Keith Moore, 09:37
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., todd glassey, 09:22
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., todd glassey, 09:14
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackofcommunicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:13
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Noel Chiappa, 09:02
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Eastlake III Donald-LDE008, 09:00
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack ofcommunicaiton here..., Noel Chiappa, 08:41
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Michael Thomas, 08:35
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack ofcommunicaiton here..., Noel Chiappa, 08:35
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, todd glassey, 08:29
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack ofcommunicaiton here..., todd glassey, 08:12
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., todd glassey, 08:12
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:46
- what happened to newtrk?, Eliot Lear, 07:40
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Eliot Lear, 07:36
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., John C Klensin, 07:21
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack ofcommunicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:06
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Andrew Newton, 07:03
- IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Brian Carpenter, 07:00
- Re: Size of pool (Was: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...), bmanning, 07:00
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Thomas Narten, 07:00
- Re: www.ietf.org unresponsive over IPv6?, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明, 07:00
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., todd glassey, 06:16
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Sam Hartman, 05:18
September 04, 2006
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Bill Fenner, 19:10
- NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., todd glassey, 07:54
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Jefsey_Morfin, 04:19
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Pekka Savola, 03:47
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Brian E Carpenter, 03:41
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Brian E Carpenter, 03:17
September 02, 2006
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:28
- 3797 details (was: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...), Frank Ellermann, 19:28
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Eastlake III Donald-LDE008, 15:49
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Avri Doria, 11:46
- Why was the trust setup as a Va. Entity? & no FTC linkage., todd glassey, 11:46
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Theodore Tso, 11:46
September 01, 2006
- RE: NomCom 2006/07: Selection Process Reset, Richard Shockey, 17:18
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Jeffrey Hutzelman, 17:02
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Ned Freed, 15:56
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), todd glassey, 15:40
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Sam Hartman, 14:18
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Eastlake III Donald-LDE008, 13:08
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Pekka Savola, 12:46
- IETF Meetings 68 & 69, rpelletier, 10:58
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Thomas Narten, 09:57
- Re: www.ietf.org unresponsive over IPv6?, Tim Chown, 09:36
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., John C Klensin, 09:36
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Frank Ellermann, 09:36
- RE: Fixing the algorithm, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:06
- Re: Fixing the algorithm, todd glassey, 07:31
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Marshall Eubanks, 06:57
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Jari Arkko, 06:57
- Re: www.ietf.org unresponsive over IPv6?, Jeroen Massar, 05:52
- Re: www.ietf.org unresponsive over IPv6?, Tim Chown, 05:19
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Jefsey_Morfin, 04:59
- RE: Fixing the algorithm, Yaakov Stein, 04:59
- Re: www.ietf.org unresponsive over IPv6?, Jeroen Massar, 04:29
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Julian Reschke, 04:00
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Brian E Carpenter, 03:18
- www.ietf.org unresponsive over IPv6?, Tim Chown, 03:18
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Yaakov Stein, 02:50
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Brian E Carpenter, 02:20
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Brian E Carpenter, 01:15
- Re: NomCom 2006/07: Selection Process Reset, Brian E Carpenter, 01:13
- Re: NomCom 2006/07: Selection Process Reset, Harald Alvestrand, 00:08